Evidence Hub

Prospective multi-region study on primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from Chinese patients

Song Z, Zhang J, He L, Chen M, Hou X, Li Z, Zhou L

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2014

600 participants · 57 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large-scale multi-region studies are urgently needed to provide comprehensive and up-to-date information on the antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori that is critical for selecting the most optimal eradication regimens.

AIMS: To determine the resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from dyspeptic patients.

METHODS: This is a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study. Helicobacter pylori cultures were successful in 600 patients (never receiving eradication therapy) from Northern, Eastern, Middle, and Southern regions between 2008 and 2012. Resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and rifampicin was determined by Epsilometer test.

RESULTS: The overall resistance rate was highest for metronidazole (403, 67.2%), followed by clarithromycin (225, 37.5%), levofloxacin (201, 33.5%), rifampicin (85, 14.2%), amoxicillin (41, 6.8%), and tetracycline (21, 3.5%). There were 16.3% isolates susceptible to all tested antibiotics, followed by mono-resistance (34.2%), double resistance (27.0%), triple resistance (16.8%), quadruple resistance (4.7%), quintuple resistance (0.7%) and sextuple resistance (0.3%). Independent factors influencing antibiotic resistance were gender (to levofloxacin), age (to levofloxacin), and endoscopic finding (to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin). Among the clarithromycin-resistant isolates, 75.6% and 48.0% were also resistant to metronidazole and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free