Evidence Hub

Sexually transmitted infections in the middle east and North Africa: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Obeid D, Alsuwairi F, Alnemari R, Al-Qahtani A, Kurdi W, Alfareh M, Alsanea M, Alabdulkareem M et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2024

15 citations

Abstract

Background: Globally, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) collectively cause 2.3 million deaths and 1.2 million cases of cancer annually. However, the epidemiology of STIs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is not well assessed because of various social and cultural factors.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and covering 23 MENA countries, 19 STIs, and data from 20,435,971 participants. PubMed, Embase, regional and international databases, and country-level reports were searched up to May 2024.

Results: The analysis revealed significant regional variations in the prevalence of STIs within the MENA region. In North Africa, the most common STIs were bacterial vaginosis (31%), human papillomavirus (HPV, 23%), and Candida spp. (15%). In the Gulf Cooperation Council region and Yemen, Ureaplasma (25%), nongonococcal urethritis (NGU, 16%), and Mycoplasma spp. (12%) were the predominant infections. In the Levant region, the top STIs were HPV (20%), hepatitis B virus (HBV, 9%), and Candida spp. (9%). In Iran, Ureaplasma spp. (18%), HPV (17%), and cytomegalovirus (8%) were the most prevalent infections, whereas Ureaplasma spp. (20%), Candida spp. (18%), and HPV (16%) were most frequently detected in Türkiye. Gender-based disparities were observed, with a higher prevalence of Ureaplasma spp., Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and herpes in men and higher rates of Mycoplasma spp., HPV,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free