Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies and Uncontrolled Trials Reporting on the Use of Checkpoint Blockers in Patients with Cancer and Pre-existing Autoimmune Disease

M. Lopez-Olivo, Johncy J. Kachira, N. Abdel-Wahab, X. Pundole, J. Aldrich, P. Carey, M. Khan, Yimin Geng et al.

European Journal of Cancer, 2024

23,897 participants · 38 citations

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICIs. Methods: We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths. Results: A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7%) followed by skin cancer (15.7%). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61% (95% CI 54% to 68%); that of flares was 36% (95% CI 30% to 43%), and that of de novo irAEs was 23% (95% CI 16% to 30%). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39%), inflammatory bowel disease (37%), and rheumatoid arthritis (36%). 32% of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23,897 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free