Evidence Hub

Remimazolam vs. propofol for general anaesthesia in elderly patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

E. Pereira, Vitor R. Y. Moraes, M. Gaya da Costa, Tatiana S. Do Nascimento, Eric Slawka, Carlos Galhardo, M. Struys

European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2024

947 participants · 38 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Elderly patients comprise an increasing proportion of patients undergoing surgery, and they require special attention due to age-related physiological changes. Propofol is the traditional agent for anaesthesia, and recently, remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has emerged as an alternative to propofol in general anaesthesia. OBJECTIVES We aim to compare remimazolam vs. propofol for general anaesthesia in elderly patients regarding hypotension, induction characteristics, haemodynamics and recovery outcomes. DESIGN Meta-analysis with sensitivity and trial sequential analyses (TSA) to assess inconsistencies. Risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were computed using a random effects model. Subgroups and meta-regression according to anaesthesia methods were also performed. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to January 1, 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Patients at least 60 years old, comparing remimazolam vs. propofol for general anaesthesia. RESULTS Eleven RCTs (947 patients) were included. Compared with propofol, remimazolam was associated with lower postinduction and intra-operative hypotension (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.62, P < 0.001) and incidence of bradycardia (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, P = 0.04), with a higher heart rate (P = 0.01). The incidence of injection pain was lower (P < 0.001), but remimazolam was associated with a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 947 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free