Evidence Hub

Phage therapy in patients with urinary tract infections: a systematic review

R. Larcher, A. Dinh, Boris Monnin, P. Laffont-Lozes, Paul Loubet, Jean-Philippe Lavigne, Franck Bruyère, A. Sotto

Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 2025

89 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria are challenging to treat. This systematic review evaluates bacteriophage therapy. Research design and methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting bacteriophage therapy in UTIs, with outcomes related to safety and efficacy, were included. Studies unrelated to UTIs or lacking clear outcomes were excluded. Bias was assessed using RoB2 and JBI appraisal tools for series and case reports. Data were synthesized narratively due to study heterogeneity. Results From 576 articles screened, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 89 participants, many with MDR and XDR infections. Phage therapy was generally well-tolerated. Efficacy varied, with some studies showing complete infection resolution, particularly in high-risk patients, while others reported partial or no improvement. Phage therapy often served as the sole viable treatment for XDR infections, yielding positive results despite small sample sizes and data heterogeneity. Conclusions Phage therapy shows promise as an alternative or adjunct to antibiotics for UTIs, especially those with limited treatment options, but uncertainties remain regarding dosing and administration. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety. Protocol registration www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 89 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free