Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of nudge-based interventions on self-monitoring behaviours among patients with cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jia-Ning Yu, Yujia Fu, Haoyang Du, Qiwei Wu, Shunmin Zhang, Bin-Yu Zhao, Erxu Xue, Yunyu Guo et al.

Health Psychology Review, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cardiometabolic diseases are major global health concerns, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Self-monitoring is crucial for managing these conditions; however, the adherence to self-monitoring remains suboptimal. Nudge-based interventions, such as reminders and automatic prescription refills, have shown promise in improving self-monitoring behaviours. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of nudge-based interventions on self-monitoring behaviours and health outcomes in this population. Thirty-five randomised controlled trials from seven databases (earliest available date to March 2025) were included. Nudge strategies were categorised according to the choice architecture taxonomy by Münscher et al. Meta-analysis demonstrated that nudge-based interventions were associated with significant improvements in self-monitoring behaviours in cardiometabolic patients (Hedge’s g = 0.56; 95% CI [0.44, 0.69]; p < 0.001) as well as reductions in HbA1c levels (MD = −0.50; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (MD = −4.47; p < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (MD = −2.02; p < 0.05) compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses indicated that the effect size of nudge interventions may vary by delivery mode, components, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that integrating diverse behavioural nudges could optimise management strategies for these patients, enhancing both self-monitoring adherence and health outcomes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free