Evidence Hub

Isolation and in silico prediction of potential drug-like compounds from Anethum sowa L. root extracts targeted towards cancer therapy

M. Saleh-e-In, Ayan Roy, M. A. Al-Mansur, C. M. Hasan, M. Rahim, N. Sultana, Shamim Ahmed, Md. Rabiul Islam et al.

Comput. Biol. Chem., 2019

20 citations

Abstract

Anethum sowa L. has been used as a spice herb in the Asian and European culinary systems to add flavour and taste. The studied plant has diverse folkloric medicinal value. Present study was designed to isolate phytochemicals from the hexane, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of the roots by various chromatographic techniques. Based on spectral analysis (IR, LC-MS, NMR) the isolated compounds were identified as physcione (1), β-sitosterol (2), stigmasterol (3), 2-oxo-3-propyl-2H-chromene-7-carboxylic acid (4), bergapten (5), 3-ethyl-7-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6) and graveolone (7). The mentioned compounds have been isolated for the first time from the roots part of the plant. Based on extensive literature review, physcione and bergapten were inferred to exhibit crucial bioactivities including inhibitory efficacy against various forms of cancer. Accordingly, in the present research approach molecular docking investigations of the isolated phytochemicals have been robustly executed with different oncogenes that have been reported to be actively involved in various forms of carcinoma. In silico investigations encompassing molecular docking analysis and drug-likeness profiling was executed to estimate the potential therapeutic tendencies of the phytochemicals targeted towards effective cancer therapy. Current investigation offers meaningful know-how pertaining to potential anticancer activities of the phytochemicals extracted from the roots of Anethum sowa L. and might open…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free