Evidence Hub

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis across different PD-L1 expression levels

A. Abushanab, M. Mustafa, M. Mousa, Renad Fawwaz Albanawi, Razan Mohammad Alkhalaileh, G. Alqudah, Razan Feras Abu Zaina, Zaina Ammar Abu Sitta et al.

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the primary approach for managing NSCLC. However, numerous combination therapies are currently under investigation. Our goal is to investigate the overall efficacy and safety of ICIs and taxane-based chemotherapy. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching web databases for relevant literature. We limited our eligibility to phase II/III randomized clinical trials involving advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients. Results We performed a meta-analysis encompassing nineteen studies derived from sixteen RCTs. For patients with sq-NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50%, using ICIs plus taxane significantly improve PFS and OS with HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45–0.74, p < 0.0001) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.33–0.50, p < 0.00001), respectively. For patients with non-sq NSCLC PD-L1 1–49%, the analysis revealed significant improvement of OS and PFS with HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47–0.88, p = 0.005) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.47–0.81, p = 0.0004), respectively. For TRAEs of all grades, ICIs plus taxane resulted with no significant difference compared to control group with risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% CI 0.99–1.02). Conclusion The analysis revealed significant improvement in efficacy of ICIs with taxane in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients compared with ICI/taxane monotherapy. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023447532).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free