Evidence Hub

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: protocol for a systematic review and sequential meta-analysis

Mei-jun Wang, Yu-nuo Jiang, Pei-pei Li, Yuan-Jie Wu

Systematic Reviews, 2025

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a progressive subtype of steatotic liver disease, imposes a substantial global health burden due to its association with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) demonstrate therapeutic potential through pleiotropic mechanisms, including appetite regulation, metabolic enhancement, and anti-inflammatory activity. However, clinical evidence remains limited by methodological heterogeneity and insufficient long-term efficacy data, necessitating a rigorous systematic evaluation. This protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating GLP-1 RAs versus placebo in adults with biopsy-confirmed MASH. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library will be conducted using predefined strategies. Two independent reviewers will perform study screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment with the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. Primary outcomes are histological: (1) MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening, and (2) fibrosis improvement without MASH deterioration. Secondary outcomes encompass physiological and biochemical parameters. Data synthesis will utilize random-effects meta-analysis, complemented by meta-regression to explore heterogeneity sources. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) will be used to control random errors (α = 0.05, power = 80%) and validate evidence sufficiency, strengthening…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free