Evidence Hub

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

N. I. Hendi, Yaser AbuSammour, Mohamed Khaled, Ahmed S. Mohamed, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Mohamed Saleh Fallaha, Basma Kamel, Yehia Nabil Abdalla Helmy et al.

Neurosurgical review, 2025

269 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Drug-resistant epilepsy is a challenging condition that affects around 30% of all patients with epilepsy. Evidence regarding treatment options is limited, especially for surgery and invasive techniques. However, non-invasive techniques constitute a promising alternative for these patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure frequency management in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We searched the literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials that compared transcranial direct current stimulation with sham stimulation. Our main outcomes of interest were a percentage reduction in seizure frequency and epileptiform discharge frequency. A total of 10 studies with 269 patients were included. Monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced by an average of -45.39%and -39.34% at week 4 and week 8, respectively. There was a significant reduction in IED in favor of tDCS at week 2 (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = [− 1.49, − 0.25], P = 0.006), 4 weeks (SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = [− 1.67, − 0.66], P < 0.00001, Moderate quality of evidence) and 8 weeks (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI = [− 1.69, − 0.53], P = 0.0002) of follow-up. There were no serious adverse events associated with the stimulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with a reduction in both seizure frequency and epileptiform discharges with minimal side effects. Further studies with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 269 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free