Evidence Hub

Risk of bleeding with dentoalveolar surgery in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ke-Lin Dou, Yue Shi, Baoyi Yang, Zhiguo Zhao

Japanese Dental Science Review, 2025

29,212 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the bleeding risks in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery who were on uninterrupted therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Methods Electronic database searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through 28 September 2024, following PICOS criteria. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias. Data were pooled to estimate risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic and I2. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to study characteristics, while sensitivity analyses were used to pinpoint potential sources of heterogeneity and evaluate the reliability of the results. Results 29 studies enrolled a total of 29,212 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated a reduced risk of bleeding in patients receiving DOACs compared to those treated with VKAs (RR = 0.79, 95 % CI: 0.68–0.92, I2 = 0 %, P = 0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced risk of bleeding with dabigatran compared to VKAs (RR = 0.40, 95 % CI: 0.23–0.67, I2 = 0 %, P = 0.0006). However, no statistically significant differences were found between rivaroxaban (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.84–1.39, I² = 38 %, P = 0.54), apixaban (RR = 0.88, 95 % CI: 0.64–1.3, I² = 0 %, P = 0.46), edoxaban (RR = 0.70, 95 % CI: 0.45–1.11, I²…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 29,212 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free