Evidence Hub

Prophylactic Antibiotics for Prevention of Infective Endocarditis or Bacteremia in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Dental Procedures: Systematic Review

Cameron Loper, Jordan Baskette, Timothy R Fagan, D. Sardana

Special Care in Dentistry: managing special patients, settings, and situations, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infective endocarditis (IE) after dental procedures in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Methods Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case‐control studies, and cohort studies in pediatric patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) before any dental procedure compared to pediatric patients undergoing the same procedures without AP to prevent IE and/or bacteremia. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the internal validity of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results 1774 studies were screened after duplicate removal. Three case‐control studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. One study evaluated IE as an outcome, whereas the other two studies evaluated bacteremia after dental procedures. Meta‐analysis could not be conducted for IE, whereas pooling results were attempted for two studies evaluating bacteremia as an outcome. The odds of IE after a dental procedure within the last 6 months with AP were higher than without AP (Odds ratio: 3.44, 95% CI: 0.93, 12.65, p = 0.06) in the only study. However, AP was effectively able to reduce bacteremia after dental procedures in two studies that evaluated bacteremia (Pooled odds ratio: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.42, p < 0.05). Conclusions The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free