Evidence Hub

Continuous glucose monitoring for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial

Andrew J. Franck, Andrew L. Hendrickson, Evan D. Telford, BreAnna L. Davids, Irina Murray Casanova, Abbie N. Rosen, S. Hadigal, R. C. Ross

Chest, 2025

43 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) could potentially improve management of hyperglycemia compared to standard point of care glucose monitoring for critically ill patients. However, there is limited evidence to support routine use of CGM in the intensive care unit.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In critically ill patients with hyperglycemia, do CGM improve time within target glucose range compared to standard of care?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an investigator-initiated, single-center, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients admitted to a medical or surgical intensive care unit, who had diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia, and were treated with insulin were eligible for enrollment. Participants were randomly assigned to have glucose monitoring performed with CGM (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). Groups were compared for glycemic control and other relevant outcomes. The primary outcome for the study was percentage of time within the normoglycemic range, defined as 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L).

RESULTS

Eighty-five participants were enrolled and randomized to study groups with 43 participants in the intervention (CGM) group and 42 patients in the control (standard of care) group. For the primary outcome, there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group (mean = 60.5%, SD = 30.5) and the control group (mean = 61.4%, SD = 28.3) in time within the goal glucose range (mean difference -0.9%, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free