Evidence Hub

High-Frequency rTMS Broadly Ameliorates Working Memory and Cognitive Symptoms in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Yuan-Wen Liu, Yi-Nan Ai, Jie Cao, Qilin Cheng, Hongwu Hu, Jing Luo, Lei Zeng, Shuxian Zhang et al.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2024

123 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the efficacy and tolerability of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of post-stroke working memory (WM) impairment and its changes in brain function. Methods In the present randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled design, 10 Hz rTMS was administered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of patients with post-stroke WM impairment for 14 days. Measures included WM (primary outcome), comprehensive neuropsychological tests, and the functional near-infrared spectroscopy test. Patients were assessed at baseline, after the intervention (week 2), and 4 weeks after treatment cessation (week 6). Results Of 123 stroke patients, 82 finished the trial. The rTMS group showed more WM improvement at week 2 (t = 5.55, P < .001) and week 6 (t = 2.11, P = .045) than the sham group. Most of the neuropsychological test scores were markedly improved in the rTMS group. In particular, the rTMS group exhibited significantly higher oxygenated hemoglobin content and significantly stronger functional connectivity in the left DLPFC, right pre-motor cortex (PMC), and right superior parietal lobule (SPL) at weeks 2 and 6. Dropout rates were equal (18% [9/50 cases] in each group), and headaches were the most common side effect (rTMS: 36% [18/50 cases]; sham: 30% [15/50 cases]). Conclusions High-frequency rTMS was effective in improving post-stroke WM impairment, with good tolerability, and the efficacy lasted up to 4…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 123 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free