Evidence Hub

Efficacy of extended infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematologic patients (BEATLE): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority clinical trial

J. Laporte-Amargós, Francisco Carmona-Torre, Maria Huguet, P. Puerta-Alcalde, R. Rigo-Bonnin, M. Ulldemolins, Montserrat Arnan, J. D. del Pozo et al.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2024

77 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of extended infusions (EI) of β-lactam antibiotics for optimising outcomes in febrile neutropenia is unclear. We assessed whether the administration of β-lactams was more effective in EI than in intermittent infusion (II) for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

METHODS

We performed a randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial of patients with febrile neutropenia at four Spanish university hospitals. Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy who required empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EI of β-lactam or II after a first dose in bolus. The choice of antipseudomonal β-lactam was left to the discretion of the attending physician. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 5, defined as defervescence without modifying the antibiotic treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of 50, 75 and 100%ƒuT>MIC, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Between November 19, 2019 and June 22, 2022, 295 patients we screened for eligibility, of whom 150 were randomly assigned to receive EI (n=77) or II (n=73) of the antipseudomonal β-lactam of choice. In the intention-to-treat analysis, treatment success at day 5 was achieved in 39/77 patients (50.6%) receiving EI versus 46/73 patients (63.0%) receiving II (risk difference -12.4%; 95% confidence interval, -29.4 to 4.7,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 77 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free