Evidence Hub

Bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: a nonrandomized clinical trial

B. Woodson, David T. Kent, C. Huntley, Melyssa K. Hancock, Douglas J. Van Daele, M. Boon, T. Huntley, S. Mickelson et al.

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (JCSM), 2025

113 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNSBL) device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea who refused, failed, or did not tolerate positive airway pressure therapy underwent implantation and nightly use of HNSBL. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were (1) a minimum of 50% reduction in the 4% apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline with a final AHI of less than 20 events/h, and (2) a minimum of 25% reduction in the 4% oxygen desaturation index. Objective secondary endpoints included changes in mean AHI, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep time with blood oxygen saturation less than 90%. Self-reported secondary endpoints included changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the short Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire score, the Symptoms of Nocturnal Obstruction and Related Events score, and bedpartner assessment of snoring. HNSBL was implanted in 113 participants. Eleven serious adverse events occurred in 10 (8.7%) participants. The coprimary endpoints were completed by 89 (77.4%) participants. AHI and oxygen desaturation index responses were achieved in 63.5% (73/115, P = .002) and 71.3% (82/115, P < .001), respectively. Secondary endpoint analysis revealed significant changes in mean AHI (−18.3 ± 11.8 events/h, P < .001), oxygen desaturation index (−17.7 ± 14.6 events/h, P < .001), and sleep time with blood oxygen saturation less than 90% (6.9 ±…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 113 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free