Evidence Hub

Selection of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer for Extended Endocrine Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the IDEAL Randomized Clinical Trial

L. J. van ‘t Veer, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Marjolijn Duijm-de Carpentier, C. V. D. van de Velde, M. Kleijn, C. Dreezen, A. Menicucci, W. Audeh et al.

JAMA Network Open, 2024

515 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Importance

There is a need for biomarkers that predict late recurrence risk and extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit among patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). MammaPrint, a 70-gene expression risk-of-recurrence assay, has been found to project significant EET benefit in patients with assay-classified low-risk tumors.

Objective

To determine the test's utility in identifying which patients with EBC in the IDEAL (Investigation on the Duration of Extended Adjuvant Letrozole) trial could benefit from 5-year vs 2.5-year letrozole treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of the IDEAL randomized clinical trial evaluated postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive EBC who were assigned to either 2.5 or 5 years of EET, with 10 years of follow-up after randomization. A 70-gene assay was used to classify tumors as high, low, or ultralow risk. Adverse event (AE) frequency and treatment compliance were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed from April 2022 to September 2024.

Interventions

After 5 years of endocrine therapy, patients were randomized to 2.5 or 5 years of EET with letrozole.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was distant recurrence (DR). Cox proportional hazard regression models and likelihood ratios tested the interaction between treatment and gene expression assay.

Results

Among 515 women included (mean [SD] age at randomization, 59.9 [9.5] years), 265 were in the 2.5-year treatment arm and 250 in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 515 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free