Evidence Hub

Association between haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio at admission and all-cause mortality in adult patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit: a secondary analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

Liping Zhong, Yuting Zhong, Weiming Chen, Fei Liang, Yilin Liao, Yuanjun Zhou

BMJ Open, 2024

4,233 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Objective The association between haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio (HRR) and all-cause mortality remains poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the influence of HRR at the time of admission mortality over 1 year and 30 days in patients with sepsis. Design This was a secondary analysis. Setting This study was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs). Participants Adult patients with sepsis were identified and included from an intensive care database based on eligibility criteria. Primary outcome and measure The primary outcome was the rate of death within 1 year. The secondary outcome was the death rate within 30 days. Results A total of 4233 patients with sepsis who met the inclusion criteria were analysed, excluding those ineligible. These participants were divided into quartiles based on their HRR at admission. The overall mortality rates at 1 year and 30 days were 42.9% and 25.5%, respectively. A significant inverse association was observed between HRR quartiles and all-cause mortality (p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons using Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in 1-year mortality rates across the quartiles. However, no significant difference was detected in 30-day mortality between the Q3 and Q4 groups (p=0.222). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a higher HRR at ICU admission was independently associated with reduced mortality at 1 year (HR, 0.935; 95% CI 0.913 to 0.958; p<0.001) and 30 days (HR, 0.969; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,233 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free