Evidence Hub

Intraoperative hypotension is associated with decreased long-term survival in older patients after major noncardiac surgery: Secondary analysis of three randomized trials

Na-Ping Chen, Ya-Wei Li, Shuang-Jie Cao, Yue Zhang, Chun-Jing Li, Weijun Zhou, Mo Li, Yaoan Du et al.

Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2024

2,664 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of intraoperative hypotension with long-term survivals in older patients after major noncardiac surgery mainly for cancer.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of databases from three randomized trials with long-term follow-up.

SETTING

The underlying trials were conducted in 17 tertiary hospitals in China.

PATIENTS

Patients aged 60 to 90 years who underwent major noncardiac thoracic or abdominal surgeries (≥ 2 h) in a single center were included in this analysis.

EXPOSURES

Restricted cubic spline models were employed to determine the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) threshold that was potentially harmful for long-term survivals. Patients were arbitrarily divided into three groups according to the cumulative duration or area under the MAP threshold. The association between intraoperative hypotension exposure and long-term survivals were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard regression models.

MEASUREMENTS

Our primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survivals.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 2664 patients (mean age 69.0 years, 34.9% female sex, 92.5% cancer surgery) were included in the final analysis. MAP 10 min) or area under MAP 30 mmHg⋅min). After adjusting confounders, duration under MAP 10 min was associated with a shortened overall survival when compared with the 30 mmHg⋅min was associated with a shortened overall survival when compared with the 10 min or area under MAP 30…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,664 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free