Evidence Hub

SARC-Calf using calf circumference adjusted for BMI predicts six-months readmission and mortality in hospitalized patients: a secondary analysis of a cohort study

C. F. Burgel, Bruna Zardo Oliveira de Carvalho, Bárbara Meichtry Milesi, F. Silva

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2024

554 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a prevalent condition associated with worse clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. The SARC-Calf is an accurate instrument for its screening; however, it includes the calf circumference (CC) measure as a criterion, which is influenced by adiposity. An adjustment for CC based on body mass index (BMI) has been proposed, but the literature lacks studies evaluating the SARC-Calf using adjusted CC.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the SARC-Calf with BMI-adjusted CC and compare it between adult and older hospitalized patients.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a cohort with prospective data collection, including individuals aged ≥18 years, lucid and able to communicate. SARC-Calf was applied using BMI-adjusted CC, obtained by subtracting 3, 7, and 12 cm from CC values when BMI was 25-29.99, 30-39.99, and ≥ 40kg/m2, respectively. Outcomes of interest included prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital death, hospital readmission, and mortality six months after discharge. Logistic and Cox regression analyses, adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index and sex, were performed.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 554 patients (mean age 55.2±14.9 years, 52.9% males). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia by SARC-Calf with BMI-adjusted CC were identified in 40.4% of patients (38.6% in adults and 42.7% in older patients, p=0.380). Suggestive signs of sarcopenia were associated with hospital readmission in adults (OR=1.8; 95%CI 1.1, 2.9), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 554 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free