Evidence Hub

Safety of Short-Term Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Use for Uncomplicated Cystitis: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

Taniguchi J, Aso S, Yasunaga H

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026

50 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is associated with hypersensitivity and other adverse reactions. East Asian-specific genetic susceptibility may increase severe adverse events, limiting the therapeutic use of TMP-SMX for uncomplicated cystitis in Japan. However, data on its short-term safety in this population are scarce. This study compared the short-term safety of TMP-SMX with fluoroquinolones for the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis using a nationwide Japanese claims database.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the JMDC Claims Database (2006-2022). We included female outpatients aged ≥ 18 years with acute uncomplicated cystitis who were newly treated with TMP-SMX or fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or tosufloxacin). The primary outcome was drug-induced hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis or treatment-requiring rash) within 7 days after the prescription of these drugs. The secondary outcomes included treatment failure, all-cause hospitalization, and other adverse events. Propensity score-overlap weighting was applied to adjust for confounding. Subgroup analyses were stratified by age (< 50 or ≥ 50 years).

RESULTS: Among 50 773 eligible patients (TMP-SMX, 2.1%; fluoroquinolones, 97.9%), the baseline characteristics were well balanced after weighting. The incidence of hypersensitivity did not differ significantly between the groups (0.9% vs. 0.7%; risk difference, 0.3%; 95% confidence interval, -0.3% to 0.8%; p = 0.410). No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free