Evidence Hub

Evolution of antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori in Spanish children: A 10-year multicenter study

Botija G, Barrio J, Martínez-Escribano B, Gallardo M, Urruzuno P, Alonso N, Vázquez JA, Barrio A et al.

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025

1,205 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To delineate the evolution of antibiotic resistance over the past decade in Spanish children diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS: An observational, retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in Madrid, Spain. This study included children diagnosed with H. pylori infection via endoscopy with positive culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing between 2011 and 2020.

RESULTS: A total of 1205 patients (56.7% female) were included in the study. Of these, 18.7% had previously undergone unsuccessful treatment. The resistance to the antibiotics tested was as follows: clarithromycin, 42.9% (n = 504, [95% confidence interval, CI: 40.1%-45.8%]); metronidazole, 24% (n = 280, [95% CI: 21.5%-26.5%]); rifampicin, 14.8% (n = 120, [95% CI: 12.4%-17.4%]); levofloxacin, 5.2% (n = 58, [95% CI: 3.9%-6.6%]); amoxicillin, 2.6% (n = 30, [95% CI: 1.7%-3.6%]); and tetracycline, 0.9% (n = 10, [95% CI: 0.4%-1.6%]). The double resistance rate was 12.2% (n = 143, [95% CI: 10.4%-14.2%]). During the study period, antibiotic resistance remained relatively stable, with a notable decrease in metronidazole (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.941, [95% CI: 0.898-0.985], p = 0.01) and double resistance (IRR: 0.933, [95% CI: 0.875-0.995], p = 0.03) values. The overall eradication rate was 76.6% (n = 752, [95% CI: 73.8-79.2%]), which was significantly higher in patients without prior treatment. The temporal progression of eradication rates showed a substantial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,205 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free