Evidence Hub

Efficacy of a 7-day vonoprazan, sitafloxacin, and amoxicillin triple therapy as a fourth-line salvage regimen for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection

Geeratragool T, Tansirichaiya S, Kamolvit W, Atthakitmongkol T, Leartsiwawinyu W, Thaipisuttikul I, Chuenprapai P, Leelakusolvong S et al.

BMC gastroenterology, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment failure of three standard regimens for Helicobacter pylori infections has increased and represents a significant challenge. The VAS regimen, consisting of vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin, represents a promising treatment option, supported by its strong acid suppression and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the VAS regimen as the fourth-line regimen for refractory H. pylori infection. METHODS: This prospective single-arm study involved patients with H. pylori infection who had failed three standard regimens. Participants received VAS regimen; comprising vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and sitafloxacin 100 mg twice daily for 7 days. Genotypic resistance was identified and CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 were studied. Eradication success was assessed using the 13C-urea breath test at 4-8 weeks post-therapy. RESULTS: Twenty patients (mean age 64.4 ± 8.6 years) were enrolled. The eradication rate was 70.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45.7–88.1) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 68.42% (95% CI: 43.5–87.4) in the per-protocol analysis. Notably, genotypic resistance demonstrated 93.9% and 85.7% of levofloxacin and clarithromycin resistance respectively. Mild adverse events were reported by three patients (15%), including loose stools, nausea, and bloating. Neither antibiotic resistance nor CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 rapid metabolizer status was associated with eradication…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free