Evidence Hub

Antibiotic resistance of urinary pathogens after kidney transplantation: a 10-year single-center survey in Germany

Weber P, Braß P, Jäger J, Jacquet L, Jansen S, Gäckler A, Jürgens C, Reinold J et al.

Infection, 2025

6,962 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common complications after kidney transplantation (KT), often resulting in severe outcomes like acute graft failure and sepsis. Factors such as diabetes, age, sex, and type of transplantation significantly influence disease progression. Rising antibiotic resistance complicates treatment, emphasizing the importance of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS), particularly during the post-transplant immunosuppression phase. Recent changes in treatment protocols, including a shift away from treating asymptomatic bacteriuria and modifications in antibiotic prescribing, highlight the need for updated resistance trend analyses.

METHODS: This retrospective study at the University Hospital Essen analyzed urine samples from kidney transplant outpatients from 2013 to 2022. Pathogen identification and resistance testing focused on common UTI pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis. Data on antibiotic prescriptions were sourced from the North Rhine Association of Statutory Health Insurance since 2017.

RESULTS: Out of 10,508 urine samples collected from 6962 patients, bacterial growth was detected in 4126 samples (39%). Escherichia (E.) coli was the most frequent pathogen (41%). Klebsiella spp., which accounted for 11.7% of all pathogens, showed increasing resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime. Resistance rates Enterococcus faecalis showing a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,962 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free