Evidence Hub

Characterization of blood and urine microbiome temporal variability in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Liu W, Chen S, Yang J, Chen Y, Yang Q, Lu L, Li J, Yang T et al.

Microbial pathogenesis, 2025

27 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Investigating the microbiota of blood and urine from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is essential to unravel the complex role of microbiota in systemic host-microbe interactions and implications.

METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal observational study to characterize the temporal dynamics of blood and urine microbiota in 27 AML patients, utilizing metagenomic analysis pipeline for microbial identification to identify disease-associated microbial signatures.

RESULTS: The composition of blood and urine microbiota of AML was dominated by Proteobacteria phylum in blood, Firmicutes phylum in urine. The species and diversity of blood and urine microbiota did not have difference between AML patients and healthy controls. Restitution of alpha and beta diversity of blood microbiota and urine microbiota to resemble that of healthy controls occurred after cessation of treatment. Temporal variation of urine microbiome was higher than blood after treatment which was closely related to pathogenic bacteria and beneficial bacteria measured by coefficient of variation (CV) of alpha diversity. The temporal variability of urine microbiota was significantly correlated with platelet and exposure of levofloxacin. The variation of microbiome of AML patients with infection was found that the relative abundance of Burkholderia significantly enriched in blood and urine which had high accuracy and sensitivity. The correlation between blood microbiota and serum amino acid metabolites…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free