Evidence Hub

Bacteriologic profile and antimicrobial resistance in infants aged 1 year or younger with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Sultanbayeva Z, Issergepova B, Kapanova A, Ruslanuly K

Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate conjunctival flora and antibiotic susceptibility in infants aged 1 year or younger with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO), creating an overall profile of antimicrobial susceptibility.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective.

METHODS: The analysis was conducted at the Kazakh Eye Research Institute over a period of 6 years, from January 2017 to December 2022. Cultures were grown on various agars for bacterial and fungal analyses, with sensitivity testing via Vitek 2 Compact.

RESULTS: We examined 1210 conjunctival cultures from infants with CNLDO, yielding 1212 isolates. Most were gram-positive bacteria (77.15%), with fewer gram-negative bacteria (22.28%) and fungi (0.57%). Among the gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus species (61.06%) were predominant, including S epidermidis (17.49%), S aureus (10.73%), and S saprophyticus (9.32%). Enterococcus species (6.52%) and Streptococcus species (6.02%) followed. Among the gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (5.78%) was most prevalent, followed by Pseudomonas species. (4.54%), Enterobacter cloacae (3.71%), and Klebsiella species (3.63%). The majority of the fungi were Candida albicans, accounting for 4 isolates (0.33%). Most of the bacteria showed high sensitivity to moxifloxacin (92.52%), levofloxacin (88.99%), gentamicin (86.74%), vancomycin (86.52%), cefotaxime (85.27%), and ofloxacin (85.62%). High resistance was noted for erythromycin (32.84%), clindamycin (28.13%), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free