Evidence Hub

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis at Abbassia Chest Hospital

Ibrahim Mostafa Mohamed Nofal, Hesham Atef AbdelHalim, Ashraf Abbass Almaraghy, A. Awad, M. Farrag

Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 2024

121 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a significant health concern. This study analyzes patients admitted to Abbassia Chest Hospital, focusing on their characteristics, drug resistance patterns, treatment outcomes, and risk factors for poor prognosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 121 patients admitted to the MDR unit at Abbassia Chest Hospital. TB diagnosis was confirmed using sputum smear microscopy, microbiological culture and sensitivity testing, and molecular methods (GeneXpert). Patient data were extracted from hospital records for statistical analysis. The mean age of MDR-TB patients was 40 years, with 75.21% being male. Key risk factors included prior TB interrupted treatment, smoking, and contact with MDR-TB patients. Resistance rates exceeded 90% for cycloserine, ethionamide, pyrazinamide, and levofloxacin, while 71.9% were resistant to amoxicillin. Sputum conversion occurred in 95.04% of patients, with a mean conversion time of 2.21 ± 1.44 months. Successful treatment was achieved in 84.3% of cases, while 45.45% experienced side effects, the most common being hyperuricemia (28.1%), gastritis, and ototoxicity (11.57% each). Bad prognosis was associated with comorbidities like ischemic heart disease (OR 15.34, p = 0.02) and delayed sputum conversion (OR 1.63/month, p = 0.03). Side effects were not linked to bad outcomes. While most MDR-TB patients achieved successful treatment outcomes, certain factors, such as comorbidities…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 121 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free