Evidence Hub

Adverse drug reactions to the nine-month all-oral and 18-month regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Indonesia

N. Mariana, Anggi Gayatri, I. Widyahening, Budiman Bela, N. Sawitri, S. Soedarsono, E. J. Nelwan, Purwantyastuti Ascobat

International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 2025

60 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background The treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) requires the long-term administration of multiple second-line drugs in combination therapy. Objective We investigated the ADRs to a 9-month all-oral regimen (i.e., pyrazinamide, ethambutol, high-dose isoniazid, levofloxacin, bedaquiline, and clofazimine) and a longer 18-months regimen (i.e., levofloxacin, bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, and cycloserine) for MDR-TB during the first 4 months of treatment. Method The patients in this cohort study were recruited from three referral hospitals in Indonesia. The inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with MDR-TB who received either the 9-month all-oral or 18-months regimens. We used the causality assessment categories from the WHO–Uppsala Monitoring Center. Results A total of 60 patients were included in this study. The ADRs included nausea and/or vomiting (48.3%), arthralgia (38.3%), prolonged QTcF interval (30.0%), among others. One case of prolonged QT interval in a grade 3 ADR was observed, in which the 18-month regimen was modified during the first 4 months of treatment. Conclusion In the first 4 months of treatment, the predominant ADRs were nausea and/or vomiting, arthralgia, and prolonged QT interval. This study showed that active patient monitoring is needed.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free