Evidence Hub

Evaluation of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular safety in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a prospective cohort study

F. Korell, L. Entenmann, S. Romann, E. Giannitsis, Anita Schmitt, C. Müller-Tidow, Norbert Frey, Peter Dreger et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2024

137 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Assessment of cardiovascular risk is critical for patients with cancer. Previous retrospective studies suggest potential cardiotoxicity of CAR T cell therapies. We aimed to prospectively assess cardiotoxicity and the predictive value of cardiac biomarkers and classical risk factors (age, cardiac function, diabetes, arterial hypertension, smoking) for cardiac events and all-cause mortality (ACM). Methods In this prospective cohort study, all patients treated with CAR T cell constructs (axi-cel, tisa-cel, brexu-cel, ide-cel, or the 3rd generation CAR HD-CAR-1) from Oct 1, 2018, to Sept 30, 2022 at the University Hospital Heidelberg were included. Surveillance included cardiac assessment with biomarkers (high-sensitive Troponin T (hs-cTnT), N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)), 12-lead-ECG, and 2D echocardiography. ACM was defined as the primary study endpoint, while cardiotoxicity, defined by clinical syndromes of heart failure or decline in ejection fraction, served as a secondary endpoint. Findings Overall, 137 patients (median age 60, range 20–83, IQR 16), were included in the study. 46 patients died during the follow up period (median 0.75 years, range 0.02–4.33, IQR 0.89) 57 month, with a median survival of 0.57 years (range 0.03–2.38 years, IQR 0.79). A septal wall thickness above 11 mm (HR 2.48, 95%-CI = 1.10–5.67, p = 0.029) was associated with an increased risk of ACM, with a trend seen for reduced left ventricular ejection fraction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 137 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free