Evidence Hub

The relationship between lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio and all-cause mortality during ICU stays in patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

Xiaoyue Guan, Lei Zhong, Jinyu Zhang, Jian-Hong Lu, Meng Yuan, Lili Ye, Jie Min

Heliyon, 2024

6,059 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

Background Sepsis is a prevalent and severe medical condition which is frequently observed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although numerous biomarkers have been identified to predict the prognosis of sepsis, the lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LDH/ALB ratio) has not been extensively investigated. The principal objective of this study is to assess the relationship between LDH/ALB ratio and all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis. Methods This study included all adult critically ill patients with sepsis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, version 2.0) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to mitigate bias, and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to evaluate the cumulative survival across different groups. The association between the LDH/ALB ratio and mortality was examined through restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis and Cox regression analysis. The robustness of the findings was confirmed through subgroup analyses. Additionally, the prognostic capability of the LDH/ALB ratio was further evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results There were 6059 adult patients with sepsis enrolled in the final analysis. RCS revealed a non-linear relationship between the LDH/ALB ratio and an increased risk of ICU all-cause mortality (χ2 = 46.900, P < 0.001). Following PSM analysis, 1553 matched pairs were obtained. As comparison to the low LDH/ALB ratio group, the mortality rate in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,059 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free