Evidence Hub

Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study

Zhang XL, Liu J, Fu P, Wang YX, Fan PP, Zhou JL, Xiang XQ, Shen HL et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the profiles and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus in the pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) of 17 hospitals in China from 2016 to 2022.

METHODS: Susceptibility testing was performed to bacterial strains with a uniform monitoring protocol, which was provided by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and used by the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET). The results were interpreted in accordance with the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing issued by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

RESULTS: Twenty-six thousand six hundred thirteen bacterial strains were isolated from 17 PICUs in China from 2016 to 2022, 3,147 of which were Staphylococcus aureus, ranking second among etiological agents of infections from PICUs. In 2022, Staphylococcus aureus had the highest detection rate, being 36.19%. And in 2021, MRSA had the highest detection rate, being 10.35% in Staphylococcus aureus. There were statistically significant differences in the annual detection rate of gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA between the years from 2016 to 2022 (P 0.05). The top 3 highest detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (2,552, 81.7%), bloodstream (217, 6.5%), and skin wounds (110, 3.9%). For MRSA, The top 3 in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (156, 77.9%), skin wounds (47, 8.8%), and bloodstream (15,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free