Evidence Hub

Meningococcal infections in Oman (2000-2025): National trends in serogroup dynamics, age-group vulnerability, antimicrobial resistance, clinical characteristics, and outcomes

Mamari AA, Rashdi AA, Rani RS, Abellera L, Al-Jardani A

Journal of infection and public health, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a major cause of bacterial infections with high mortality and long-term complications. Understanding its epidemiology is crucial for prevention, vaccination strategies, and clinical management. This study describes 25-year national trends in serogroup distribution, age-specific vulnerability, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and antimicrobial susceptibility in Oman.

METHODS: This retrospective study included all laboratory-confirmed Neisseria meningitidis cases reported to the Central Public Health Laboratory, Oman, from January 2000 to June 2025. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were extracted from medical records. Serogrouping was performed using slide agglutination or PCR, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing followed CLSI guidelines.

RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 101 samples were included. Median age was 14 years; infants < 1 year accounted for 26%. Males comprised 68.8%, and Omani nationals 91.7%. Serogroup W was most prevalent (40.6%), followed by B (21.9%), with non-groupable strains represented 24%. Invasive infections accounted for 82.3%, predominantly associated with serogroup W, while non-groupable strains were linked to localized infections. Overall mortality was 16.7%, significantly associated with complications and HD/ICU admission. All isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, meropenem, rifampin, chloramphenicol, and azithromycin. Susceptibility rates were reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free