Evidence Hub

Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections from a general hospital in Ningxia, China, 2022-2023

Hu X, Tao J, Yan L, Hong W, Wang W, Wang L, Li G, Jia W

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

257 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the antibiotic resistance, resistance genes and clonal relationship of Escherichia coli in bloodstream infections in Ningxia from 2022 to 2023.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the antibiotic susceptibilities of 257 isolates. PCR was used to detect blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, qnrS, qnrA, qnrB, oqxA, qepA, gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE, and the clonal relationship through multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine of 257 patients were male (50.2%). The 257 E. coli isolates were mainly obtained from the Emergency, Hepatobiliary Surgery, and Haematology Departments, accounting for 56.6%, 7.3%, and 6.2%, respectively. There is no significant difference in sex and genes between the two groups over and under 60 years old (P > 0.05), but there is a significant difference in ST between them(P<0.05). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the 257 isolates had the highest rates of resistance to ampicillin (82.8%), followed by cefazolin (71.6%), and all isolates were susceptible to tigecycline. Based on the antibiotic susceptibility results for ceftriaxone, we tested 126 isolates of E. coli for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) resistance genes. As a result, blaCTX-M was detected in 76 isolates (60.32%), blaSHV in 26 isolates (20.63%), and blaTEM in 38 isolates (30.16%). Based on the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin antibiotic susceptibility results, we tested for quinolone resistance genes in 148 isolates, revealing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 257 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free