Evidence Hub

Importance of Urine Culture and Antibiotic Sensitivity for Improving Clinicians' Choice in Treating Urinary Tract Infections

Mannari JG, Kanjariya G, Shah MK, Modi C, Ganjiwale J

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2024

300 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The local antibiogram is essential to prevent the development of multidrug-resistant organisms. The aim of the study was to find out the synchronization of empirical antibiotics with the sensitivity pattern of the urine culture report and to study the differences in the organisms and sensitivity patterns in urinary tract infection (UTI) with and without other comorbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

UTI, diagnosed by a positive urine culture report of 300 consecutive patients above the age of 18, was studied retrospectively. The data were processed using the statistical software STATA 14.

RESULTS

Out of 300 patients, 58.3% were females. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 54.19 (19.06) years. The most common associated comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (DM) (34.7%). Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were the most common presenting symptom, followed by dysuria and fever. The most common organism was Escherichia coli in both nondiabetic and diabetic patients (67.3% and 60.6%). Comparing diabetics and nondiabetics, recurrent UTI (15.4 vs 5.1%), infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) organisms (67.3 vs 51.5%), and prolonged hospitalization (75 vs 61.2%) were observed more in diabetics. The most common empirical antibiotic chosen was cefoperazone-sulbactam in the diabetic group and levofloxacin in the nondiabetic group. Empirical antibiotics in diabetics matched with the sensitivity in 57.1% of ESBL cases and 47% of non-ESBL cases, while in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free