Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index and Community Periodontal Index in Patients With Major β-Thalassemia: A Case-Control Study

Foad Yahyapour, Mozhgan Faezi, H. Semyari, N. Rejeh, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Nourbakhsh, Sara Monem Moharrer

Special Care in Dentistry: managing special patients, settings, and situations, 2025

80 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare periodontal health between thalassemia patients and healthy individuals by assessing the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) and the Community Periodontal Index (CPI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This analytic case-control study was conducted at two centers in Tehran, Iran, involving 80 thalassemia patients (case group) and 80 healthy individuals (control group), matched by sex and age (15-25 years). Demographic data, OHI-S, and CPI were collected from all participants. For group comparisons, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed data, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was employed for multiple comparisons. Multiple logistic regression and ANOVA were also applied. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20, with a significance level set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The two groups showed statistically significant differences in the CPI and OHI-S indexes (p < 0.05). The multiple logistic regression model revealed that thalassemia affects the OHI-S index but not the CPI index.

CONCLUSION

Patients with thalassemia major experience more severe periodontal disease than healthy individuals. Given the study's limitations, further research is recommended to investigate the risk factors for periodontal problems in thalassemia patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free