Evidence Hub

Placement of cesium-131 permanent brachytherapy seeds in periventricular high-grade gliomas: case report highlighting a novel technique to prevent seed migration. Illustrative cases

A. Wernicke, Julia M. Cavallaro, F. Ablyazova, C. Teng, Anurag Sharma, Jake R. McDermott, John A. Boockvar

Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) with external beam radiation therapy is limited by the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). Intraoperative brachytherapy offers a localized radiation approach that minimizes RN risk while maintaining tumor control. However, seed migration has historically limited its use in periventricular regions. The authors present 3 cases of recurrent periventricular HGG (2 IDH-wildtype, MGMT promoter–methylated, EGFR-amplified WHO grade 4 glioblastoma and 1 WHO grade 3 astrocytoma) in which a three-layered barrier was created between the ventricular lining and tumor cavity to prevent seed migration, enabling successful brachytherapy. OBSERVATIONS Following maximal safe resection, a three-layered patch separated the resection cavity from the ventricle prior to cesium-131 (131Cs) brachytherapy. Patient 1 received suture-stranded 131Cs (20 seeds), while patients 2 and 3 received 131Cs GammaTile (6 tiles, 4 seeds per tile). A three-layered barrier was formed using Gelfoam, Surgicel, and Adherus. At a median 22-month (range 11–24 months) follow-up, MRI confirmed no seed migration and seeds remained in the cavity. There were no complications associated with the barrier placement. LESSONS This study highlights the novel use of this technique in preventing 131Cs seed migration in intraoperative brachytherapy, serving as a proof-of-concept study. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25176

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free