Evidence Hub

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel predictor of sarcopenia in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study exploring associations across body composition categories

Y. M., P. Parmar, Soumya Sharma, Jay Kakadiya, Dhruv Lakkad

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2025

411 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Sarcopenia is prevalent among hemodialysis patients and is associated with poor outcomes. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an easily obtainable marker of inflammation, may predict sarcopenia risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between NLR and sarcopenia risk in maintenance hemodialysis patients, examining this association in the context of obesity. This cross-sectional study included 411 maintenance hemodialysis patients. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria-2019 (AWGS 2019). Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Logistic regression models examined associations between NLR and sarcopenia risk, adjusting for potential confounders. Analyses were stratified by obesity status. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 51% (95% CI: 45.1-54.9%), with 37.2% classified as sarcopenic non-obese and 13.6% as sarcopenic obese. In fully adjusted models, each unit increase in NLR was associated with 10% higher odds of sarcopenia overall (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21, p = 0.048). This association remained significant in sarcopenic obese patients (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.00-1.32, p = 0.049). Patients in the highest NLR tertile had 1.95 times higher odds of sarcopenia compared to the lowest tertile (95% CI: 1.12–3.40, p = 0.018), with a significant trend across tertiles (p-trend = 0.015). NLR is independently associated with sarcopenia risk in hemodialysis patients, including those with obesity. These…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 411 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free