Evidence Hub

Patients’ acceptability, adherence and satisfaction on the modified shorter all-oral multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen: a two-phase cross-sectional study in Tanzania

J. Lalashowi, H. Mvungi, Zawadi Mwaisango, D. Pamba, A. Mohamed, C. Gitige, P. Shayo, Isaac Lekule et al.

BMJ Open, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Objectives To determine patients’ acceptability, satisfaction and adherence to shorter all-oral multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) regimen in Tanzania. Design A two-phase cross-sectional study with data collected within 6 months of Removed Injectable modified Short-course regimens for EXpert MDR-TB (RISE) study implementation and the second phase within 15 months of implementation using the same reference populations. Settings 18 health facilities across eight regions of Tanzania. Participants Rifampicin-resistant TB/MDR-TB patients enrolled in the RISE study. Outcome measures We assessed patients’ acceptability, adherence and satisfaction with the regimen using an interval scale structured questionnaire. Results The majority of the patients found the shorter oral MDR-TB treatment acceptable, adhered to it well and were generally satisfied. The median score (IQR) for acceptability was 1.7 (1.03–2.00) but it ranged between 1.3 (1.3–2) and 1.7 (1–1.79) for the first and second phases, respectively. Regarding adherence, the median score (IQR) stood at 4 (3.67–4.67) with scores significantly higher in the second phase at 4.33 (4.00–5.007) compared with the first at 4.67 (4.00–5.0), p value=0.01. The overall satisfaction was high at 1.5 (1.33−1.78) but it ranged between 1.22 (1.00–1.78) and 1.42 (1.11–1.78) for the first and second phases, respectively. Worrying about side effects was statistically associated with adherence (p value<0.05). No statistically significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free