Evidence Hub

Thrombolytic Therapy After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With STEMI From Medically Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Series

Jia-Cheng Lai, Chongjian Huang, Lei Wang, R. Cheng, Qing-Tong Wang, Yongsheng Han

The American journal of case reports, 2025

12 participants

Abstract

Case series Patients: Male, 52-year-old • Male, 64-year-old • Female, 67-year-old • Male, 36-year-old • Male, 68-year-old Male, 62-year-old • Female, 82-year-old • Male, 74-year-old • Fenale, 72-year-old • Male, 51-year-old Male, 62-year-old • Male, 82-year-old Final Diagnosis: Return of spontaneous circulation in STEMI Symptoms: Cardiac arrest Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Cardiology Objective: Management of emergency care Background Although current guidelines classify prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as a relative contraindication to thrombolytic therapy, this treatment may serve as a viable reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cannot be performed in a timely manner or is unavailable. This case series evaluated the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy after ROSC in 12 patients with STEMI. Case Reports Twelve patients with STEMI (9 men and 3 women; mean age, 64.33 years) who had just returned to continuous spontaneous circulation via CPR received thrombolytic therapy at 3 hospitals (Hospital I, 1 patient; Hospital II, 9 patients; Hospital III, 2 patients) between April 2007 and February 2021. Electrocardiography showed anterior wall elevation in 66.7% and inferior wall elevation in 33.3% of patients; the ischemic site was independent of CPR duration (P=0.890). CPR duration was associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free