Evidence Hub

Switching from Zoledronic Acid to Denosumab for Bone Modification Therapy in Patients with Malignant Tumors and Renal Insufficiency: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review

Jun-Mei Zhang, Xue-Zheng Wang, Yan Xue

Case Reports in Oncology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Zoledronic acid is a common treatment for bone metastases in malignancies, but it is contraindicated in patients with severe renal insufficiency due to its nephrotoxicity. Dose adjustments are necessary for those with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Denosumab is not metabolized by the kidney, hence providing an alternative for patients who are unable to receive zoledronic acid due to nephrotoxicity. Case Presentation: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 4 patient cases with bone metastases from solid tumors (two breast cancer, one prostate cancer, and one lung cancer), all developed nephrotoxicity during zoledronic acid treatment and subsequently switched to denosumab. Renal function either improved or remained stable following the switch. And a review of the literature related to denosumab was conducted. Conclusion: Patients with abnormal renal function, BRCA1 mutations, or those at high risk of developing skeletal-related events may benefit from denosumab over zoledronic acid. During denosumab treatment in patients with renal dysfunction, attention should be paid to the occurrence of hypocalcemia.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free