Evidence Hub

Immunotherapy-Related Pancreatitis: A Case Series of 8 Patients from a High-Volume Oncology Centre

Tomás San Martín, Jaime González-Montero, Alberto Espino, Carlos I Rojas, M. Burotto

Case Reports in Oncology, 2025

8 participants

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including the rare complication of immune-related acute pancreatitis (irAP). Current knowledge about irAP is limited to case reports and retrospective studies. Case Presentations: We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients diagnosed with irAP at a high-volume tertiary cancer centre in Chile between 2021 and 2025. Data were collected on cancer type, immunotherapy regimen, symptoms, enzyme levels, imaging, and treatment. The irAP diagnosis was established according to the American Gastroenterological Association criteria. Adverse reactions were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Of the 8 included patients, 4 had melanoma, 2 had breast cancer, and 2 prostate cancer. Seven received PD-1/CTLA-4 combination therapy, and 1 received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The median time to the irAP diagnosis was 5 months. Seven patients presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. Enzyme elevations and imaging findings were variable. All patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids, and 3 required hospitalisation. Four patients were rechallenged with ICIs. Other grade ≥2 irAEs were observed in 6 patients. No deaths were directly attributable to irAP. Conclusion: As demonstrated, these manifestations can diverge substantially from those of classical pancreatitis, so establishing an irAP diagnosis requires a comprehensive assessment. Corticosteroids are an effective treatment in most cases, and ICI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free