Evidence Hub

Case of epididymitis leading to diagnosis of incomplete behcet's disease

Fukuda T, Nishizaki K, Fukui K, Suzuki T

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, 2025

Abstract

A 50-year-old male was diagnosed with acute epididymitis and treated with levofloxacin, however, no improvement was noted. The patient was thus referred to our department for further examinations and treatment. While there were no results indicating pyuria, ceftriaxone was started for acute epididymitis based on clinical findings, though the condition did not improve. Epididymal abscess was suspected, and CT and MRI examinations were performed, which only revealed swelling of the epididymis. The patient was then referred to the Department of Rheumatology for a fever of unknown origin and tested for various autoantibodies, all of which were negative, though gallium scintigraphy showed accumulation in multiple joints. Behcet's disease was suspected and colchicine treatment started, which resulted in a dramatic relief of symptoms. Subsequently, fundus angiography revealed fern-like fluorescent leakage. Furthermore, painful ulcers were found in the oral cavity, leading to a final diagnosis of incomplete Behcet's disease. Presently, colchicine treatment is continuing and there has been no recurrence.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free