Evidence Hub

Mycobacterium celatum encephalitis in an immunocompromised host mimicking autoimmune striatal encephalitis: the first case report

Taweephol T, Pongpitakmetha T, Anukoolwittaya P, Marukatat C, Rattanawong W, Hemachudha P, Vanichanan J, Rotcheewaphan S et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Encephalitis is rarely caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), which is generally not considered a highly virulent pathogen. However, NTM encephalitis in immunocompromised hosts occurs with varied clinical presentations, posing a diagnostic challenge in clinical practice. This study aims to describe an atypical case of NTM encephalitis caused by Mycobacterium celatum, which has not previously been reported to infect the central nervous system of immunocompromised hosts, mimicking autoimmune striatal encephalitis (ASE).

CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old immunosuppressed woman presented with prolonged fever for 4 months and rapidly progressive cognitive decline for 3 months. Neurological examination showed impaired cognition and parkinsonism. Laboratory testing was unremarkable. Her brain imaging on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2/FLAIR) exhibited lesions involving basal ganglia and subcortical white matter in both hemispheres, mimicking ASE. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed mild pleocytosis with normal glucose and protein levels. CSF comprehensive microbiological studies and autoimmune panels were negative. ASE was suspected, and immunotherapies were given. Despite immunotherapies, her condition worsened with seizures, warranting a stereotactic brain biopsy to achieve a definite diagnosis. Her brain tissue pathology result was non-specific. However, we identified M. celatum from her brain tissue. Thus, the final diagnosis was M.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free