Evidence Hub

Case report: Rare case Pandoraea ssp causing bacteremia associated with CRBSI in patients with hydrocephalus post intraventricular hemorrhage drain revision at Prof. Ngoerah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali

Pramitasari Kade Cintya, Dhany Hendri Nara, Iswari Ida Sri, Rustawan I. Nengah Tony, Niryana I. Wayan

GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024

Abstract

Introduction: Pandoraea species is a multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacillus usually isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and also commonly found in water and soil. Bloodstream infection with Pandoraea ssp in non-CF patients is uncommon. We report the first case of post-revision VP shunt hydrocephalus with bacteremia and associated CRBSI caused by Pandoraea ssp. Case description: A 50-year-old Balinese man with underlying disease of sepsis by Pandoraea ssp. after several histories of surgery, a patient with non-communicating hydrocephalus and intraventricular hemorrhage after endoscopic Intra Ventricular Hemorrhage evacuation and revision of the proximal shunt. The patient complained of being unconscious for 2 days, slurred speech, weakness in half of the body, vomiting once, seizures, and a fever. The CVC device was installed for 20 days, and he had a fluctuating fever during the hospitalization. Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin were given intravenously for empiric treatment. Pandoraea ssp. were isolated from both his blood samples and exit site; once the pathogen and drug sensitivity were confirmed, levofloxacin was planned for definitive treatment. One month after the patient was admitted, his condition worsened and he was pronounced dead. Discussion: Pandoraea ssp. had been reported in this patient with multiple organ dysfunction as a complicating factor. In our case, the potential source of this bacteria was considered to be contamination from the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free