Evidence Hub

Comment on “Delayed-Onset Type 1 Kounis Syndrome Caused Ventricular Fibrillation: A Case Report”

A. Cömert, Nurcemal Şentürk

Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2026

1,838 participants

Abstract

We read with interest the case by Cui et al. describing delayed-onset Type 1 Kounis syndrome triggered by levofloxacin and complicated by ventricular fibrillation (VF). 1 The report highlights the overlap between allergic activation and coronary vasoreactivity but raises several diagnostic and therapeutic concerns. In this case, aspirin 300 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg were given before angiography despite normal cardiac biomarkers. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines advise against pretreatment with P2Y 12 inhibitors when an early invasive strategy is planned, recommending loading only after coronary anatomy is known. 2 Initial management of allergic coronary syndromes may focus on anti-allergic and vasodilator therapy. Observational evidence also discourages dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in vasospastic settings. In the VA-Korea Registry of 1,838 patients with vasospastic angina, DAPT increased adverse outcomes compared with no antiplatelet therapy, whereas aspirin alone was neutral. 3 A further issue is the unreported QTc interval. Fluoroquinolones, including levo-floxacin, can prolong repolarization and provoke torsades de pointes or VF, especially with ischemia or electrolyte imbalance. 4 The electrocardiogram in this case suggests a QTc near 480 ms, yet QT or electrolyte data were absent. Levofloxacin-induced QT prolongation could thus have contributed to arrhythmogenesis. Serial QTc and electrolyte monitoring would help determine whether the arrhythmia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 1,838 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free