Evidence Hub

Prevalence of bedaquiline resistance in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xinyang Hu, Zhiwei Wu, Jing Lei, Yanqin Zhu, Jingtao Gao

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2025

36 citations

Abstract

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health challenge. While bedaquiline (BDQ) offers improved treatment outcomes for patients with multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB), its widespread use has led to the emergence of BDQ resistance. This systematic review evaluated the prevalence of BDQ resistance among adult patients through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity and compare prevalence estimates across groups. The Joanna Briggs Institute’s quality assessment checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Cochran’s Q and I 2 tests.This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024620791. The weighted average prevalence of BDQ resistance was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.6–8.3), with acquired resistance reported at 5.4%. Geographic differences were observed, with South Africa showing a higher prevalence (10.4%) compared to China (2.4%).High-quality studies reported a prevalence of 5.2%, while fair-quality studies reported 7.7%. Mutations in the Rv0678 gene represented a significant proportion, reaching as high as 65.6%. Our findings highlight an increasing trend in acquired resistance to BDQ, offering critical insights for managing MDR-TB. The application of whole-genome sequencing shows promise for advancing understanding of drug resistance mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis .

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free