Evidence Hub

Faropenem for the management of infectious diseases – A systematic review of in vitro susceptibility tests and clinical studies

Amitrajit Pal, Dattatray Pawar, Akhilesh Sharma

Journal of Laboratory Physicians, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

This comprehensive review aimed to understand the activity and resistance pattern of faropenem compared to other antimicrobial agents. A literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify studies published in the English language. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies involving adults and/or children with respiratory or urinary tract infections that evaluated faropenem use and resistance patterns compared to other antibiotics, in inpatient, outpatient, and/or preclinical settings. In vitro studies reporting the activity of faropenem against clinical isolates of bacteria were included in the study. Of 327 identified articles, two clinical and 21 in vitro studies were considered eligible. The clinical studies, which included adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis, showed improvement with faropenem compared to cefuroxime. The in vitro studies indicated the activity of faropenem against Gram-positive (e.g., Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Clostridium, and Enterococcus) and Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Hemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus, Pseudomonas, Citrobacter, and Bacteroides species) compared to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination, cefpodoxime, levofloxacin, and azithromycin. Faropenem also showed activity against β-lactamase–producing and penicillin-, ampicillin-, and methicillin-resistant strains. Faropenem exhibited antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of bacterial pathogens, including resistant strains.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free