Evidence Hub

Histological response and blood glucose level in a diabetic animal model after the oral administration of Mucuna pruriens: A systematic review and meta-analysis

T. Pangestiningsih, Dian Meididewi Nuraini, Morsid Andityas, Ariana Ariana

Veterinary World, 2025

Abstract

Background and Aim: Mucuna pruriens (MP) has emerged as a promising natural antidiabetic agent due to its rich bioactive composition. Although numerous preclinical studies have reported its hypoglycemic and histological benefits, a comprehensive synthesis quantifying these effects has been lacking. This study systematically evaluated the dual impact of orally administered MP extract on histopathological changes and blood glucose levels in diabetic animal models through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Material and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) without date restrictions. Eligible in vivo studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and data were extracted following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the systematic review center for laboratory animal experimentation tools. Histological outcomes were summarized descriptively, while blood glucose levels were analyzed quantitatively using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on MP concentration, duration of administration, and plant part used. Results: Sixteen studies were included, with 13 eligible for meta-analysis. MP extract significantly reduced blood glucose levels, with an overall standardized mean difference of −18.36 (95% confidence intervals: −21.22, −15.51; p 4 weeks), whereas higher doses (≥200 mg/kg) were most effective within 1–4 weeks.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free