Evidence Hub

Is Helicobacter pylori infection associated with animal contact? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xin Wang, Kun Xu, Tao Zhang, Ji-hui Zeng, Peng Feng, He Liu, Jingfei Zhang, Juan-Juan Gao et al.

Journal of public health, 2025

10 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection has been reported in both humans and animals. This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the correlation between H. pylori infection in humans and animal rearing/contact.

METHODS

This study was conducted by searching five databases from their creation to 25 November 2024. The data was analyzed using Review Manager software. Heterogeneity was estimated with I2 statistics. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was significant; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies and 10 662 subjects were finally included. Animal rearing/contact was significantly associated with higher odds of H. pylori infection (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.42-2.28, P < .001). The OR value of H. pylori infection in individuals rearing/contact with domestic animals was 1.71 times that of those without rearing/contact (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.33-2.21, P < .001). H. pylori infection was correlated with dog rearing/contact (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.24-4.08, P = .008), but not with pet (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.94-2.78, P = .09) and cat (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96-1.67, P = .10) rearing/contact. Rearing/contact with animals (OR: 2.04 and 1.62), domestic animals (OR: 1.90 and 1.40), and dogs (OR: 4.11 and 1.50) were risk factors for H. pylori infection in adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed that H. pylori infection in humans was correlated with animal rearing/contact, particularly in adults.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free