Evidence Hub

Mitochondrial dysfunction in Wilson disease: a systematic review and meta–analysis across human and animal models

Raya Amin, Valentina Medici, E. Fausak, Keren Sierra, Ieleen Li, J. Gong, Cecilia Giulivi

Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Background & Aims Wilson disease (WD) is a genetic disorder of copper metabolism caused by ATP7B mutations, leading to hepatic and systemic copper accumulation. While lysosomes are early storage sites, mitochondria appear highly vulnerable to copper toxicity. We performed a systematic review and meta–analysis to assess mitochondrial outcomes in WD patients and animal models. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and SciFinder were searched through 11 September 2025, for studies reporting hepatic mitochondrial endpoints in WD (in patients and models using mice, rats, and dogs). Outcomes included mitochondrial copper, morphology, oxidative stress, mtDNA copy number, ATP production, and respiratory Complex activities. Random–effects meta–analyses were conducted. Results Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Mitochondrial copper was consistently elevated (standardized mean difference ±standard error: 6.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.001), with ultrastructural abnormalities (4 ± 2, P = 0.012). Oxidative stress markers increased (2.9 ± 0.9, P = 0.001), while MnSOD and aconitase declined with disease progression. mtDNA copy number was reduced (−0.7 ± 0.3, P = 0.032). ATP synthesis (−1.5 ± 0.6, P = 0.023) and Complex activities (−1.0 ± 0.3, P = 0.001) were impaired, especially in older or symptomatic subjects. Citrate synthase activity increased (2.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.003), consistent with compensatory biogenesis. Several abnormalities appeared in presymptomatic or young animals. Conclusion Across human and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free